As the opioid crisis and injection drug use continue, pharmacists can look to previous outbreaks to guide their responses to the HIV–injection drug use syndemic.
It was announced in a news release: On February 25, 2015, the Indiana Department of Health acknowledged a “quickly spreading” outbreak of HIV in the southeastern part of the state.1 Since mid-December 2014, 26 new cases of HIV had been confirmed. Of those cases, only a handful were associated with sexual transmission. The rest were associated with injection drug use—specifically, intravenous injection of oxymorphone hydrochloride (Opana ER), a powerful opioid painkiller. The drug, the agency noted, is “more potent, per milligram, than OxyContin.”1
In 2015, the US was in the midst of the second wave of the opioid epidemic.2 The first wave began in the 1990s, fueled by overprescription of OxyContin (oxycodone hydrochloride). Between 1999 and 2010, prescription opioid sales quadrupled; during that same period, opioid-related overdose deaths more than doubled, from 2.9 deaths to 6.8 deaths per 100,000 individuals2 (see the Figure3,4 for the latest data on overdose-related deaths). As federal agencies began their crackdown on so-called pill mills and the street price of OxyContin soared—up to $1 per milligram—people with opioid use disorder turned to heroin.5
According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, a drug becomes popular because it’s available.6 Heroin from Colombia and Mexico began to take hold in the US, edging out heroin sourced from southeast and southwest Asia. “That heroin got here every year cheaper and every year more potent,” said author Sam Quinones during a 2022 appearance at a National Institute on Drug Abuse Director’s Special Lecture.7 Quinones is a former Los Angeles Times reporter who has written extensively on the injection drug use epidemic.
In reality, it was heroin’s low cost—not its purity—that was a root cause of the overdose problem. In 2014, research findings published in Addiction indicated that “each $100 decrease in the price per gram of pure heroin” led to a 2.9% increase in heroin-related overdose hospitalizations.5 Compared with OxyContin, the price of pure heroin was significantly cheaper: In 2015, a gram of heroin retailed for an average of $267.8 A single-dose bag, typically 0.1 g, retailed for between $5 and $20,9 making the drug a cheap and convenient substitute for the opioid pills that were becoming much more difficult to get.
In addition to the adverse health outcomes associated with regular opioid use, the intravenous administration of these drugs can lead to additional health concerns, from lesions to collapsed veins to infective endocarditis. People who inject drugs also face social stigma and discrimination that can lead to worsened mental and other health outcomes.10 Research has shown that compared with other forms of social stigma, stigma against drug use is “greater than against smoking, obesity, and mental illness.”11 Research has also correlated the relationship between drug use stigma and risky health behaviors—specifically, the sharing of syringes and other injection equipment and an increase in risky sexual behavior.11
Back in 2015 in Scott County, Indiana, rates of HIV diagnoses among individuals who injected drugs continued to rise. Ultimately, a total of 215 HIV infections were recorded, 167 of whom were coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) either before or during the outbreak.12-14 And although this particular outbreak is behind us, the co-occurrence of HIV infections, HCV infections, and injection drug use persists. In public health parlance, these complex relationships are known as synergistic epidemics, or syndemics. Syndemics frequently arise out of a “perfect storm” of conditions, where 2 or more diseases or health conditions intersect in communities rife with social and structural inequities that allow these conditions to cluster and flourish, amplifying the impact of each disease and creating complex health challenges for affected populations.15,16 In the case of HIV and injection drug use, the syndemic is still ongoing.
According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, there have been at least 9 documented HIV outbreaks associated with shared and reused syringes since 2014.17 Researchers found that in addition to the prevalence of substance use disorder, individuals impacted by these outbreaks were more likely to have lower levels of education and to be living in poverty. On the whole, these individuals also struggle to access quality, evidence-based health care; are faced with racism, homophobia, and transphobia, in addition to HIV- and substance use disorder– related stigma in health care settings; and experience higher rates of intimate partner violence, particularly among women. Together, these factors paint a grim picture.
However, there is hope in the form of harm reduction, an evidence-based approach which has been deemed “critical to engaging with people who use drugs and equipping them with lifesaving tools and information.”18 It is, according to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, a “key pillar” in the US Department of Health and Human Services Overdose Prevention Strategy.18
Harm reduction encompasses a “spectrum of strategies” intended to “meet drug users where they’re at,” according to the National Harm Reduction Coalition,19 addressing the conditions of drug use along with the drug use itself (see Sidebar19). On a policy level, these principles require direct engagement with people who use drugs to deliver interventions that are designed with specific individual and community needs in mind. In practice, harm reduction empowers people who use drugs by providing tools that prevent overdose and infectious disease transmission and improve physical, mental, emotional, and social well-being.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, harm reduction is an area where pharmacists can shine. Pharmacists are already practicing harm reduction in the course of delivering standard care to patients: screening for risk factors that might lead to drug use, considering adverse childhood experiences, and balancing other social determinants of health that factor into the delivery of trauma-informed, team-based care.20 Building on that framework, the jump to providing harm reduction services specific to the current HIV-injection drug use syndemic is easy to envision.
Pharmacists have been acknowledged as a “key, but underutilized resource” in the harm reduction space, according to a brief published by the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD),21 because of not only their accessibility but also their ability to develop genuine relationships with the patients in their care. “The profession of pharmacy is well-poised to have a positive impact on reducing opioid-related harm on both individual and population levels,” wrote the authors of a 2022 review of the pharmacist’s role in the opioid crisis, which was published in Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation.22
Dispensing naloxone, screening for HIV infection, dispensing HIV pre- or postexposure prophylaxis (PrEP, PEP), and providing syringe service programs are just a few of the harm reduction methods in which pharmacists can engage. However, there are challenges, ranging from stigma around PReP and PEP medications in certain patient populations to patient access in rural areas and varying state-level legal authority for pharmacists to prescribe these medications. Not every state grants pharmacists the legal authority to dispense naloxone to patients without a prescription from a primary care provider, and there are several limiting factors around the sale of nonprescription syringes, including individual pharmacists’ personal beliefs.
Much like the substance use they are designed to address, syringe services programs, or needle exchange programs, face stigma of their own.23,24 But despite that stigma, data suggest that these programs are associated with positive outcomes, including an approximately 50% reduction in the incidence of HIV and HCV, and, when combined with medication-assisted therapy for opioid use disorder, can reduce HIV and HCV transmission by more than two-thirds. Crucially, research has found that syringe service programs do not increase drug use; instead, they may actually provide support and motivation to people who inject drugs to change their behaviors and enter treatment or rehabilitation programs.25
Researchers have analyzed the data from the 2015 Scott County outbreak and have largely concluded that the timely implementation of harm reduction efforts likely could have prevented the HIV outbreak before it began.13 Today, legislators, policy makers, and health care providers are more aware than ever of the importance of harm reduction efforts in protecting individuals and communities. In many jurisdictions, community pharmacists remain at the center of these efforts. A comprehensive approach, inclusive of community pharmacists, “can have a profound impact, especially in marginalized communities,” wrote the authors of a NASTAD blog post.26 “By granting pharmacists the necessary legal authority, [they] can offer the essential resources of naloxone, nonprescription syringes, and PrEP and PEP services—effectively empowering [people who use drugs] and preventing HIV transmissions,” they concluded.
READ MORE: Public Health Resource Center
Pharmacy practice is always changing. Stay ahead of the curve: Sign up for our free Drug Topics newsletter and get the latest drug information, industry trends, and patient care tips, straight to your inbox.