This week, a divided America watched as the Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding whether to reinstate restrictions on accessing mifepristone, an essential drug used in medication abortion.
In recent years, the issue of abortion has attracted much political and legal attention. After the constitutional right to abortion was overturned in the Supreme Court’s ruling of Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the abortion landscape in the US fractured.1 Thirteen states wasted no time in enacting trigger laws designed to immediately ban abortion the moment federal protections were overturned.2 Elsewhere, states remained committed to preserving essential reproductive care. Two years later, political momentum on the issue has not let up.
Mifepristone, a medication abortion drug, was approved in 2000 by the FDA.3 Originally, the conditions of the approval required that only physicians could give the drug to women in-person. But in 2021, the FDA amended these conditions to expand access to mifepristone amid stay-at-home orders and office closures during the COVID-19 pandemic. The agency permanently removed the in-person dispensing requirement associated with mifepristone, and broadened the scope of who could dispense the drug.4
In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade, effectively ending all federal protections on abortion and returning the power to regulate the practice back to the states and their elected representatives.1 Just this week, the first abortion case since that ruling took place in the Supreme Court in FDA v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), and Danco Laboratories LLC v AHM. The high court will review a lawsuit from the AHM aimed at shortening the window during pregnancy to use medication abortion and reinstating the in-person dispensing requirement to receive mifepristone, challenging the FDA’s 2021 decision that expanded its access.3
Although the FDA may have eased in-person restrictions on mifepristone, many states have pushed back. But in states where abortion remains legal and protected, momentum to expand access to the drug has grown: despite statewide bans, the year 2020 saw the highest number of women accessing abortions in over a decade.5 The high court’s decision could roll back this progress nationwide.
Despite the result of its 2022 decision, the Supreme Court seems likely to maintain access to mifepristone. The justices were skeptical whether the anti-abortion doctors who filed the lawsuit against the FDA had legal standing to sue, citing “federal conscience protections” that already shield physicians from providing care, such as abortion, that they morally object to.9
READ MORE: Women's Health Resource Center
National Support for Medication Abortion Access Increased Since Dobbs Decision
January 16th 2025Support for and personal interest in expanded access to advance provision and over-the-counter medication abortion has increased significantly since the constitutional right to abortion was overturned by the Supreme Court.